- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork26.3k
Fix codegen, change str comparison opeator to == for proper equality …#150611
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
pytorch-botbot commentedApr 3, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results athud.pytorch.org/pr/150611
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ⏳ 1 Pending, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commitcc5e884 with merge base9e10601 ( UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
linux-foundation-easyclabot commentedApr 3, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
|
cyyever left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LGTM
cyyever commentedApr 4, 2025
@pytorchmergebot merge -i |
pytorchmergebot commentedApr 4, 2025
Merge startedYour change will be merged while ignoring the following 1 checks:pull / cuda12.4-py3.10-gcc9-sm75 / test (pr_time_benchmarks, 1, 1, linux.g4dn.metal.nvidia.gpu) Learn more about merging in thewiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to thePyTorch DevX Team |
pytorchmergebot commentedApr 4, 2025
The mergejob was canceled or timed out. This most often happen if two merge requests were issued for the same PR, or if merge job was waiting for more than 6 hours for tests to finish. In later case, please do not hesitate to reissue the merge command |
cyyever commentedApr 4, 2025
@pytorchmergebot merge -f "MPS pending" |
pytorchmergebot commentedApr 4, 2025
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag,bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in thewiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to thePyTorch DevX Team |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
cc@ezyang@SherlockNoMad@EikanWang@jgong5@wenzhe-nrv