Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

CI for performance tests#992

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
filmor merged 25 commits intopythonnet:masterfromlosttech:features/PerfTests-CI
Feb 13, 2020

Conversation

lostmsu
Copy link
Member

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Runs performance tests in CI, comparing build with new changes against the latest (2.3 as of now) NuGet release.

Does this close any currently open issues?

#886

Checklist

Nothing applicable.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commentedNov 21, 2019
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging#992 intomaster willnot change coverage.
The diff coverage isn/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@##           master     #992   +/-   ##=======================================  Coverage   86.75%   86.75%           =======================================  Files           1        1             Lines         302      302           =======================================  Hits          262      262             Misses         40       40
FlagCoverage Δ
#setup_linux65.56% <ø> (ø)⬆️
#setup_windows71.52% <ø> (ø)⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend -Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing data
Powered byCodecov. Last updatea6c55d4...031e8bb. Read thecomment docs.

@lostmsulostmsu removed the WIP labelNov 21, 2019
@lostmsulostmsu requested a review fromfilmorNovember 21, 2019 17:36
@lostmsu
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@filmor if you are to merge this, I recommend squashing the commit, as there are many intermediate changes, which are insignificant on their own.

@lostmsulostmsu removed the request for review fromfilmorNovember 21, 2019 17:39
@lostmsulostmsu added the WIP labelNov 21, 2019
@lostmsulostmsu removed the WIP labelNov 21, 2019
@lostmsu
Copy link
MemberAuthor

OK, test is passing, and I can see inAppVeyor logs for 3.5 x64 xplat build, that performance is checked.

BTW, 3.5 x64 xplat is the only configuration where perf test runs, as it is the only configuration supported by the published NuGet package.

@lostmsulostmsu requested a review fromfilmorNovember 21, 2019 22:01
@lostmsulostmsu changed the titleWIP: CI for performance testsCI for performance testsNov 22, 2019
@lostmsu
Copy link
MemberAuthor

I guess this boils down to how much flakiness we can tolerate in perf tests in CI. Letting a bit more wiggle room in the performance goal should make it very unlikely to fail randomly.

@filmorfilmor merged commitf5548e3 intopythonnet:masterFeb 13, 2020
AlexCatarino pushed a commit to QuantConnect/pythonnet that referenced this pull requestJun 27, 2020
* attempted to add performance tests to CI* attempt to fix PerformanceTests xplat CI build* enabling building PerformanceTests for Mono* fixed AppVeyor path to Python.PerformanceTests.dll* fixed Mono deb sources to bionic* slightly relaxed perf target for WriteInt64Property* PerformanceTests: explicitly specify platform* use framework-specific build of perf tests in xplat and generic otherwise* added perf tests run to Travis CI* better error message for a failure to run benchmarks* appveyor: don't run perf tests in unsupported configurations* fixed performance test Python version condition in AppVeyor* explicitly notify when performance tests are skipped in AppVeyor* relax performance targets to ~10%, improve perf failure message* switch to the release of Microsoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies package
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@filmorfilmorfilmor approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
@lostmsu@codecov-io@filmor

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp