Problem statement

Currently deepObjects are not supported, this PR adds that support.

Description

Example spec

components:parameters:exampleParameter:name:paramObjin:queryrequired:trueexplode:truestyle:deepObjectschema:type:objectproperties:count:type:integername:type:string

Sadly it doesn't really fit in theParameterDeserializersFactory ideology as it would never reach that step asget_value() inparameters.py would always fail as it tries to find thename of theparam_or_header in the specific location. This is because how a deepObjects query param looks like (e.g.someurl.com/?paramObj[count]=1&paramObj[name]=John), the function would try to findparamObj in the location, which it would not find as the QueryParams will be split into a dict like this:{'paramObj[count]': 1, 'paramObj[name]': John}.

In my proposed solution it would split the location dict key into 2 parts, the actual key we want to findparamObj and then create a dict of the 2nd part of the key (whats inside the brackets) with its actual value:{'count': 1, 'name': 'John'}.
Afterwards this dict is checked via the schema of the object.

I highly doubt this solution will get accepted, so if you know a way to make this cleaner/better please lmk 🙏

Todos

• Tests

Related issue

• Is there support for deep Object in query params #250