- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork673
feat: Publish const PLANNER_ACCESS#3221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
codecovbot commentedJun 24, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3221 +/- ##======================================= Coverage 97.32% 97.32% ======================================= Files 98 98 Lines 6057 6058 +1 =======================================+ Hits 5895 5896 +1 Misses 162 162
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Thanks@matthias-reiff! These string-based access constants are sort of soft-deprecated as we have the enums now, but makes sense for consistency.
ba6f174
intopython-gitlab:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
From Issue#3220