- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork673
test: adapt functional tests for GitLab 15.8#2494
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
@nejch If you want to explore the other tests that are failing due to the GitLab version bump feel free. Otherwise I will try to get to it tomorrow after I finish my work day. |
43c70c5
toeb56aad
CompareUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
e5db411
toaa413eb
Comparenejch commentedFeb 13, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
@JohnVillalovos I looked at the bulk import failures. It's now disabled by default with 15.8 on the instance and gives a cryptic 404 (filed it upstream:https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/391545). I can try to tackle that as I worked on bulk imports. But I havent looked at the user deletion issues yet. This might take a little more work to upgrade. |
@nejch Thanks for investigating. This is probably going to be a weekend project for me. |
Newer versions of GitLab will refuse to create a user with a weakpassword. In order for us to move to a newer GitLab version in testinguse a stronger password for the tests that create a user.
Now GitLab is returning two custom attributes for a user. So don'tassert that there are no custom attributes on a new user.[1]https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/108250
Switch to newer version of GitLab for testing.
I believe this was now merged as part of another PR.@JohnVillalovos if you think we missed something please reopen 🙇 (I know some parts are disabled at the moment, but still in the code). |
Agreed! Thanks. |
No description provided.