Hi@vectro. thanks for the earlier discussions and for looking into this. We usetox to manage our environments and versions so you can use that before pushing to make sure all the test & lint jobs succeed consistently with the versions we track.

https://github.com/python-gitlab/python-gitlab/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#running-unit-tests

One of these is a commitlint check as we parse commits to create changelogs so this might need a bit of a squash andamend once it's ready for review 🙇

@nejch I ran tox and see some errors that I'm not sure what to do with. What do you think?

• At gitlab/v4/cli.py:352 related to SidekiqManager but I'm not really sure what that class should look like. Should it even have an _obj_cls attribute?
• At tests/meta/test_mro.py:122 because Generic is now the final class in the MRO (I suppose) and not RESTManager.
• cz is unhappy but presumably that can be resolved by squashing commits.

@vectro sorry for the super late response! I haven't checked this in depth myself but a few pointers:

• the SidekiqManager failure probably has to do with the fact you removed the optional_obj_cls there. We do have a few quirky managers without a defined_obj_cls, but some parts of the code rely on it so we default toNone in the base.
• test_mro.py is a custom check and is explained in more detail herehttps://github.com/python-gitlab/python-gitlab/blob/30117a3b6a8ee24362de798b2fa596a343b8774f/tests/meta/test_mro.py. If a new approach to typing makes that redundant we can potentially get rid of that but not sure if that's the case here already.@JohnVillalovos might be able to help a bit more here as he did the work on that initially.
• cz: yes, just squash/amend the commit message according tohttps://github.com/python-gitlab/python-gitlab/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#commit-message-guidelines and you should be fine :)

I'm not sure your code gets checked by mypy as expected, as the generics part is defined outside theif TYPE_CHECKING block - unless I'm misunderstanding something here:

Also keep in mind@JohnVillalovos did some work on typing recently so that might affect your rebase here.

This Pull Request (PR) was marked stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Please remove the stale label or comment on this PR. Otherwise, it will be closed in 15 days.

This PR was closed because it has been marked stale for 15 days with no activity. If this PR is still valid, please re-open.