I like this a lot! I'm still thinking about my comment from#1649 (comment). I'd limit it to issues and PRs where we're getting stuck because of user inaction, with no clarification - and not those that are confirmed bugs/valid requests but we haven't done anything about them. Does that make sense?

For that we could maybe useonly-* orexempt-* with some of our existing labels, or think of something new. We do useawaiting feedback quite a lot, that would be a good candidate for example.

I'd also make it a bit more lenient (maybe 90 days for stale, 15 days to close) in case people are on vacation? Sometimes even I don't respond to an issue within 30 days.. 😸

I like this a lot! I'm still thinking about my comment from#1649 (comment). I'd limit it to issues and PRs where we're getting stuck because of user inaction, with no clarification - and not those that are confirmed bugs/valid requests but we haven't done anything about them. Does that make sense?

For that we could maybe useonly-* orexempt-* with some of our existing labels, or think of something new. We do useawaiting feedback quite a lot, that would be a good candidate for example.

That could work. Just need to figure out what we want to use. But I would useexempt-* as want this automated not something where we need to tag something before it will get automatically moved to stale.

I'd also make it a bit more lenient (maybe 90 days for stale, 15 days to close) in case people are on vacation? Sometimes even I don't respond to an issue within 30 days.. 😸

90 days! Seems so long 😁 But yeah can do that.