Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Could you "re-close" https://github.com/python-gitlab/python-gitlab/issues/2249 as "Not planned"?#2992

stdedos started this conversation inIdeas
Discussion options

I guess, since you are "distancing yourself" from the logic of Gitlab's output, you are not planning to "fix" this 😅

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

@stdedos I'm not sure GitHub even distinguished betweenClosed as completed /Closed as not planned back in 2022 when this was discussed, but if it's something you feel strongly about we can do it sure.

But otherwise, not sure what you mean by "distancing ourselves" here? I had a quick re-read and one of them is a project setting (default branch) and the other is actual, existing branches, which I guess could lead to some discrepancies if GitLab allows setting these independently, but that is simply what the API returns. Is this an issue for python-gitlab specifically?

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@stdedos
Comment options

@stdedos I'm not sure GitHub even distinguished betweenClosed as completed /Closed as not planned back in 2022 when this was discussed, ...

Oops 😅 I didn't notice that

... but if it's something you feel strongly about we can do it sure.

Not so much, no (esp. after hearing the above) - but I did happened to get there, and I tend to interpret purple as "what the title says was a problem, and it was fixed and I don't need to really read it unless I'm really digging it".

But otherwise, not sure what you mean by "distancing ourselves" here? ... but that is simply what the API returns. Is this an issue for python-gitlab specifically?

That is exactly what I mean. If the API does that, then it does that. You are just an API wrapper. So "all these" are better expressed by the "Close as not planned. Won’t fix, can’t repro, duplicate, stale" state (i.e.Not planned)


Either way, (again) thank you for taking the time@nejch 🙏

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Category
Ideas
Labels
None yet
2 participants
@stdedos@nejch

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp