Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 87.754% when pulling791f7a6 on murrayrm:sumblk_implicit_interconnect into1502d38 on python-control:master.

Very cool!

I particularly like that it appears possible with this to leave out the ‘name’ keyword for the constitutive systems for simple interconnections like this. Am I correct in that? Nice to have that option because thst keyword is somewhat redundant and prone to errors when code gets modified.

If you give the sumblock more input names (eg 3 instead of 2), does it sum those three signals?

it appears possible with this to leave out the ‘name’ keyword for the constitutive systems for simple interconnections like this. Am I correct in that?

Correct. The following works just fine (from#516):

P = ct.tf2io(ct.tf(1, [1, 0]), inputs='u', outputs='y')C = ct.tf2io(ct.tf(10, [1, 1]), inputs='e', outputs='u')sumblk = ct.summation_block(inputs=['r', '-y'], output='e')T = ct.interconnect((P, C, sumblk), inplist='r', outlist='y')

(P,C, andsumblk all have names automatically assigned, but not needed here).

If you give the sumblock more input names (eg 3 instead of 2), does it sum those three signals?

Yup. Any number of inputs can be summed together. Thesummation_block function does not require named signals, so you can also doct.summation_block(7) if you want aLinearIOSystem that has 7 inputs and 1 output (sum of the inputs), for example).

Some possible tweaks:

• I think I may use the termsumming_junction (instead ofsummation_block) to line up with the term we use in FBS.
• I will add a bit more documentation, both in docstrings and in the manual
• I want to switch all examples usingInterconnectedSystem to useinterconnect since using the class constructor since the function provides a slightly higher level interface (eg, the class constructor still requires the explicit signal name).

Awesome.

New name for summer sounds better.

Hoping this will make creating simulink-like interconnected system simulations much easier. I will let you know how it goes once it’s been merged in.

Very nice!

(Now we will have users demanding a graphical editor next 😁. Implemented as jupyter notebook widget or the like.)