Let me know what you think. If it looks good I will update documentation in modules and in conventions.rst

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 84.278% when pullingdc53eb9 on sawyerbfuller:default_dt_0 intod3142ff on python-control:master.

Coverage increased (+0.08%) to 84.296% when pulling9aed7cc on sawyerbfuller:default_dt_0 intod3142ff on python-control:master.

some remarks:

• most of the unit tests worked as-is with the change, except for ones that implicitly assumeddt=None during the tests. After making that assumption explicit on such systems, pretty much everything worked
• most of the effort came in implementing a test for static gain inStateSpace andTransferFunction classes (maybe one is needed iniosys?)
• and in standardizing the use oflti.common_timebase everywhere in the software when interconnecting systems
• I tested it on a few pages of my own code full of discrete and cont time systems and everything worked unchanged
• all unit tests work for both dt=0 and dt=None as defaults

For the defaults, it seems like most people are going use the same default for transfer functions, state space systems, and I/O systems. Right now they have to set three defaults. Does it makes sense to collapse this to just one configuration variable? Or perhaps allow both: a "global"default_dt with individual overrides if you want them.

Also: since this will nominally break code, I propose putting this into v0.9 (versus 0.8.4, which we are close to releasing).

Will try to take a closer look at the code itself in a bit.

Hi Richard, this all makes sense and sounds reasonable. There was some reason (I think it was mostly expedience) for why I didn’t just use a a global default dt - I think I had decided that something about the global defaults hadn’t been completely implemented yet, but let me take a look, I agree that would be the right way to do it if possible.

OK made a few suggested changes:

• default dt is now package-wide. change it withset_defaults('control', default_dt=0)
• re-incorporated timebaseEqual with deprecation warning
• improved a few unit tests

latest commit creates a new, potentially-useful method,is_static_gain() for StateSpace and TransferFunction systems. refactored theirinit methods to use it now rather than what it used to be, which was a function internal to the respective module

• during refactor, added the ability toinit using a dt keyword, as suggested in issueProblem with DT State-Space Response #419. If dt is received as both a positional and a keyword argument, the user receives a warning and the positional argument is used.

I think this should also resolve#399

Did someone check to merge your PRs with@samlaf's? They seem to work on overlapping functionality.

Did someone check to merge your PRs with@samlaf's? They seem to work on overlapping functionality.

@bnavigator good to check. A brief glance through suggests that they are are basically operating on different aspects of the iosys functionality, and I don't anticipate any merge problems, except for the occasional empty line. The devil is in the details, of course. I don't know git will enough to do a test merge. If any issues crop up you can let me know and I will be happy to take a look at it.

I made a test merge inbnavigator#1 and reactivated TravisCI for my fork. Tests look good so far, there were merge conflicts in both merges, because the edits were in lines next to each other. Please check, if I resolved correctly.

Originally posted by@bnavigator in#433 (comment)

I postet the comment in the wrong thread. Meant to post it here, so that@samlaf gets notified too. Alas, another mention.

Superseded by#490