- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork441
Added option for computing anti-stabilizing solutions of Riccati equations#281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
coveralls commentedMar 21, 2019 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
moorepants commentedMar 21, 2019
Can you please add unit tests to demonstrate the new functionality? |
Sure, done ;) |
Thanks for your contribution! The unit test needs to go in |
now it should be at the correct location ;) btw. Why is@coveralls telling that coverage decreased? |
Changes look good. Will include in 0.8.2 release after verifying there are no conflicts. |
Sometimes also anti-stabilizing solutions of Riccati equations are of interest. The slicot routine offers to compute these solutions, so I added an option in the
care
anddare
routine, which both default back to the stabilizing case.