Aug 31, 2023 · Aug 31, 2023
diff --git a/faq/design.po b/faq/design.po
 #
 # Translators:
 # Ching-Lung Chuang, 2015
 # SiriusKoan, 2022
 # Steven Hsu <hsuhaochun@gmail.com>, 2023
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: Python 3.12\n"
 "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
 "POT-Creation-Date: 2023-08-21 00:03+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2023-02-18 13:10+0800\n"
 "Last-Translator:Adrian Liaw <adrianliaw2000@gmail.com>\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2023-08-31 11:34+0800\n"
 "Last-Translator:Steven Hsu <hsuhaochun@gmail.com>\n"
 "Language-Team: Chinese - TAIWAN (https://github.com/python/python-docs-zh-"
 "tw)\n"
 "Language: zh_TW\n"
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
 "Plural-Forms: nplurals=1; plural=0;\n"
 "X-Generator: Poedit 3.2.2\n"
 "X-Generator: Poedit 3.3.2\n"
 "X-Poedit-Bookmarks: -1,-1,-1,-1,-1,93,25,-1,-1,-1\n"

 #: ../../faq/design.rst:3
 "就像介面規範一樣，一個適當的測試規則在建造大型又複雜的 Python 應用程式時可以"
 "幫上忙。事實上，他可能可以有更好的表現，因為介面規範無法測試程式的特定屬性。"
 "舉例來說，:meth:`!list.append` 方法應該要在某個內部的串列最後面加上新的元素，"
 "而介面規範沒辦法測試你的 :meth:`!list.append` 是不是真的有正確的實作，但這在測"
 "試套件裡是件很簡單的事。"
 "而介面規範沒辦法測試你的 :meth:`!list.append` 是不是真的有正確的實作，但這在"
 "測試套件裡是件很簡單的事。"

 #: ../../faq/design.rst:592
 msgid ""
 "such as using a 'leading dot', have been rejected in favour of explicitness "
 "(see https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2016-May/040070.html)."
 msgstr ""
 "類似的提案包括引入語法以進一步減少程式碼量，例如使用「前導點 (leading "
 "dot)」，但這些提案已被捨棄，以維持程式的明確性（參閱 https://mail.python.org/"
 "pipermail/python-ideas/2016-May/040070.html）。"

 #: ../../faq/design.rst:715
 msgid "Why don't generators support the with statement?"
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
Expand Up		@@ -4,21 +4,23 @@
		#
		# Translators:
		# Ching-Lung Chuang, 2015
		# SiriusKoan, 2022
		# Steven Hsu <hsuhaochun@gmail.com>, 2023
		msgid ""
		msgstr ""
		"Project-Id-Version: Python 3.12\n"
		"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
		"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-08-21 00:03+0000\n"
		"PO-Revision-Date: 2023-02-18 13:10+0800\n"
		"Last-Translator:Adrian Liaw <adrianliaw2000@gmail.com>\n"
		"PO-Revision-Date: 2023-08-31 11:34+0800\n"
		"Last-Translator:Steven Hsu <hsuhaochun@gmail.com>\n"
		"Language-Team: Chinese - TAIWAN (https://github.com/python/python-docs-zh-"
		"tw)\n"
		"Language: zh_TW\n"
		"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
		"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
		"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
		"Plural-Forms: nplurals=1; plural=0;\n"
		"X-Generator: Poedit 3.2.2\n"
		"X-Generator: Poedit 3.3.2\n"
		"X-Poedit-Bookmarks: -1,-1,-1,-1,-1,93,25,-1,-1,-1\n"

		#: ../../faq/design.rst:3
Expand DownExpand Up		@@ -1034,8 +1036,8 @@ msgstr ""
		"就像介面規範一樣，一個適當的測試規則在建造大型又複雜的 Python 應用程式時可以"
		"幫上忙。事實上，他可能可以有更好的表現，因為介面規範無法測試程式的特定屬性。"
		"舉例來說，:meth:`!list.append` 方法應該要在某個內部的串列最後面加上新的元素，"
		"而介面規範沒辦法測試你的 :meth:`!list.append` 是不是真的有正確的實作，但這在測"
		"試套件裡是件很簡單的事。"
		"而介面規範沒辦法測試你的 :meth:`!list.append` 是不是真的有正確的實作，但這在"
		"測試套件裡是件很簡單的事。"

		#: ../../faq/design.rst:592
		msgid ""
Expand DownExpand Up		@@ -1229,6 +1231,9 @@ msgid ""
		"such as using a 'leading dot', have been rejected in favour of explicitness "
		"(see https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2016-May/040070.html)."
		msgstr ""
		"類似的提案包括引入語法以進一步減少程式碼量，例如使用「前導點 (leading "
		"dot)」，但這些提案已被捨棄，以維持程式的明確性（參閱 https://mail.python.org/"
		"pipermail/python-ideas/2016-May/040070.html）。"

		#: ../../faq/design.rst:715
		msgid "Why don't generators support the with statement?"
Expand Down