- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork396
Traducido c-api/code#176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Genial! Hice una pregunta nomás.
c-api/code.po Outdated
| #: ../Doc/c-api/code.rst:8 | ||
| msgid "Code Objects" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| msgstr "Objetos de código" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
¿Hay un objeto llamadoCode? Si es así, supongo que deberíamos utilizar:
| msgstr "Objetosde código" | |
| msgstr "Objetos*Code*" |
a lo largo de todo el archivo.
pregunto desde la ignorancia porque no tengoni idea de la API de C.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Si, es un tipo de objeto. Lo que hice con los otros tipos de objetos fue remover el "de" para hacerlo más como un tipo de objeto, es decir, lo dejaría comoObjetos Código. Lo mismo hice con los "Function objects" y los dejé como "Objetos Función". Te parece? dejame subir otra versión y si te suena muy raro, los dejo todos como*Code*
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Me parece bien lo que decís. Vos sos nuestro C-guy acá 😄
No description provided.