Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork3.1k
Some cleanup in partial plugin#17423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Diff frommypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code: jax (https://github.com/google/jax)- jax/_src/nn/functions.py:585: error: Argument 1 to "custom_jvp" has incompatible type "Callable[[Array | Any | Any | Any | bool | int | float | complex, int | tuple[int, ...] | None, Array | Any | Any | Any | bool | int | float | complex | None, Array | Any | Any | Any | bool | int | float | complex | None], Array]"; expected "Callable[..., Never]" [arg-type]- jax/_src/scipy/special.py:1059: error: Argument 1 to "custom_jvp" has incompatible type "Callable[[Array | Any | Any | Any | bool | int | float | complex, int], Array]"; expected "Callable[..., Never]" [arg-type]- jax/experimental/rnn.py:245: error: Argument 1 to "custom_vjp" has incompatible type "Callable[[Array, Array, Array, Array, Array, int, int, int, float, bool, str | Precision | tuple[str, str] | tuple[Precision, Precision] | None], tuple[Array, Array, Array]]"; expected "Callable[..., Never]" [arg-type]+ jax/_src/scipy/stats/norm.py:161: error: Redundant cast to "Array" [redundant-cast]- jax/_src/cudnn/fused_attention_stablehlo.py:1000: error: Need type annotation for "output" [var-annotated]- jax/experimental/pallas/ops/tpu/flash_attention.py:1579: error: Need type annotation for "res" [var-annotated]pwndbg (https://github.com/pwndbg/pwndbg)- pwndbg/gdblib/events.py:160: error: Need type annotation for "before_prompt" [var-annotated] |
hauntsaninja left a comment• edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Thanks, I was just looking into this, had pretty similar diff. There's one more bug in my implementation, I will merge this and add the additional fix
ilevkivskyi commentedJun 22, 2024
Yes, I also have#17424, andmaybe one more. |
- Fixes another crash case / type inference in that case- Fix a false positive when calling the partially applied function withkwargs- TypeTraverse / comment / daemon test follow up ilevkivskyi mentionedon the original PRSee also#17423
- Fixes another crash case / type inference in that case- Fix a false positive when calling the partially applied function withkwargs- TypeTraverse / comment / daemon test follow up ilevkivskyi mentionedon the original PRSee also#17423
Fixes#17405
Apart from fixing the crash I fix two obvious bugs I noticed while making this PR.
cc@hauntsaninja