Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

gh-99266: ctypes: Preserve a more detailed exception in _SimpleCData.from_param#99760

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
kumaraditya303 merged 15 commits intopython:mainfromkamilturek:gh-99266
Jan 21, 2023

Conversation

@kamilturek
Copy link
Contributor

@kamilturekkamilturek commentedNov 24, 2022
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Closes#99266.

The exception fromfd->setfunc is now saved and then restored if the object doesn't have an_as_parameter_.

@kamilturekkamilturekforce-pushed thegh-99266 branch 2 times, most recently fromfba818d to6d8d1ceCompareNovember 24, 2022 21:00
@AlexWaygoodAlexWaygood changed the titlegh-99266: Preserve a more detailed exception in from_paramgh-99266: ctypes: Preserve a more detailed exception in _SimpleCData.from_paramNov 24, 2022
@kamilturekkamilturek marked this pull request as ready for reviewNovember 24, 2022 22:10
Copy link
Contributor

@eric-wiesereric-wieser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

This LGTM, thanks!

kamilturek reacted with heart emoji
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Please add some tests, the doctests are not run by the buildbots.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phraseI have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@kamilturek
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@kumaraditya303: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 added topic-ctypes 🔨 test-with-buildbotsTest PR w/ buildbots; report in status section labelsJan 21, 2023
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by@kumaraditya303 for commit924e7bf 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the:hammer: test-with-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-botbedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbotsTest PR w/ buildbots; report in status section labelJan 21, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@kamilturek
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Thanks for the help and review! 🙂 That was a pleasure.

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 merged commitb4e11a7 intopython:mainJan 21, 2023
@kamilturekkamilturek deleted the gh-99266 branchJanuary 21, 2023 13:49
@kamilturekkamilturek restored the gh-99266 branchJanuary 21, 2023 13:49
@kamilturekkamilturek deleted the gh-99266 branchJanuary 21, 2023 13:49
@kamilturekkamilturek restored the gh-99266 branchJanuary 21, 2023 13:51
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@eric-wiesereric-wiesereric-wieser approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ctypes: wrong exception message in docs

4 participants

@kamilturek@bedevere-bot@eric-wieser@kumaraditya303

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp