* Switch to using asyncio.timeout instead of asyncio.wait_for`asyncio.wait_for` creates a task whereas `asyncio.timeout` avoids doing this.Fallback to using `async_timeout` when the python version is too old (<3.11)`asyncio.timeout` will become the underlying implementation for `async.wait_for` in cpython 3.12python/cpython#98518

asyncio.wait_for creates a task whereas asyncio.timeout doesn't.Fallback to a vendored version of async_timeout on Python < 3.11.async.timeout will become the underlying implementation forasync.wait_for in Python 3.12:python/cpython#98518

asyncio.wait_for creates a task whereas asyncio.timeout doesn't.Fallback to a vendored version of async_timeout on Python < 3.11.async.timeout will become the underlying implementation forasync.wait_for in Python 3.12:python/cpython#98518

asyncio.wait_for creates a task whereas asyncio.timeout doesn't.Fallback to a vendored version of async_timeout on Python < 3.11.async.timeout will become the underlying implementation forasync.wait_for in Python 3.12:python/cpython#98518

`asyncio.wait_for` creates another tasks which leads to somerace conditions in cancelation and a performance hitcpython 3.12 will change the underlying implementation of`asyncio.wait_for` to use `asyncio.wait` but that is stilla long way off for many people:python/cpython#98518

Fallback to using async_timeout on older pythonasyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed incpython 3.12. Seepython/cpython#98518

Fallback to using async_timeout on older pythonasyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed incpython 3.12. Seepython/cpython#98518

Fallback to using async_timeout on older pythonasyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed incpython 3.12. Seepython/cpython#98518

Fallback to using async_timeout on older pythonasyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed incpython 3.12. Seepython/cpython#98518

asyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed in cpython 3.12.Use async_timeout instead until the minimum supported version is 3.11+ and it can be replaced with asyncio.timeoutSeepython/cpython#98518

async_timeout does not suffer from the same raceproblems as asyncio.wait_forseepython/cpython#98518for more details

wasted some time because asyncio.wait_for() was suppressing cancellations. [0][1][2]deja vu... [3]Looks like this is finally getting fixed in cpython 3.12 [4]So far away...In attempt to avoid encountering this again, let's try usingasyncio.timeout in 3.11, which is how upstream reimplemented wait_for in 3.12 [4], andaiorpcx.timeout_after in 3.8-3.10.[0]python/cpython#86296[1]https://bugs.python.org/issue42130[2]https://bugs.python.org/issue45098[3]kyuupichan/aiorpcX#44[4]python/cpython#98518

wasted some time because asyncio.wait_for() was suppressing cancellations. [0][1][2]deja vu... [3]Looks like this is finally getting fixed in cpython 3.12 [4]So far away...In attempt to avoid encountering this again, let's try usingasyncio.timeout in 3.11, which is how upstream reimplemented wait_for in 3.12 [4], andaiorpcx.timeout_after in 3.8-3.10.[0]python/cpython#86296[1]https://bugs.python.org/issue42130[2]https://bugs.python.org/issue45098[3]kyuupichan/aiorpcX#44[4]python/cpython#98518

`asyncio.wait_for` creates another tasks which leads to some race conditions in cancelation and a performance hitcpython 3.12 will change the underlying implementation of `asyncio.wait_for` to use `asyncio.wait` but that is still a long way off for many people:python/cpython#98518

* Switch usage of asyncio.wait_for to async_timeout`asyncio.wait_for` creates another tasks which leads to some race conditions in cancelation and a performance hitcpython 3.12 will change the underlying implementation of `asyncio.wait_for` to use `asyncio.wait` but that is still a long way off for many people:python/cpython#98518* adjust ci