Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.3k
gh-96130: Rephrase use of "typecheck" verb for clarity#98144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I'm sympathetic to the issue report, especially in case this helpsclarify to new users that Python itself does not do type checking at runtime
JelleZijlstra approved these changesOct 10, 2022
AA-Turner approved these changesOct 11, 2022
Contributor
miss-islington commentedOct 12, 2022
Thanks@hauntsaninja for the PR, and@JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11. |
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull requestOct 12, 2022
bedevere-bot commentedOct 12, 2022
GH-98200 is a backport of this pull request to the3.11 branch. |
bedevere-bot commentedOct 12, 2022
GH-98201 is a backport of this pull request to the3.10 branch. |
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull requestOct 12, 2022
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull requestOct 12, 2022
I'm sympathetic to the issue report, especially in case this helpsclarify to new users that Python itself does not do type checking at runtime(cherry picked from commited6344e)Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull requestOct 12, 2022
I'm sympathetic to the issue report, especially in case this helpsclarify to new users that Python itself does not do type checking at runtime(cherry picked from commited6344e)Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull requestOct 14, 2022
* main: (38 commits)pythongh-98251: Allow venv to pass along PYTHON* variables to pip and ensurepip when they do not impact path resolution (pythonGH-98259) Bpo-41246: IOCP Proactor avoid callback code duplication (python#21399) bpo-46364: Use sockets for stdin of asyncio only on AIX (python#30596)pythongh-98178: syslog() is not thread-safe on macOS (python#98213) Mark all targets in `Doc/Makefile` as `PHONY` (pythonGH-98189)pythongh-97982: Factorize PyUnicode_Count() and unicode_count() code (python#98025)pythongh-96265: Formatting changes for faq/general (python#98129) tutorial: remove "with single quotes" (python#98204)pythongh-97669: Remove Tools/scripts/startuptime.py (python#98214) signalmodule.c uses _PyErr_WriteUnraisableMsg() (python#98217)pythongh-97669: Fix test_tools reference leak (python#98216)pythongh-97669: Create Tools/patchcheck/ directory (python#98186)pythongh-65046: Link to logging cookbook from asyncio docs (python#98207) Formatting fixes in contextlib docs (python#98111)pythongh-95276: Add callable entry to the glossary (python#95738)pythongh-96130: Rephrase use of "typecheck" verb for clarity (python#98144) Fix some incorrect indentation around the main switch (python#98177)pythongh-98172: Fix formatting in `except*` docs (python#98173)pythongh-97982: Remove asciilib_count() (python#98164)pythongh-95756: Free and NULL-out code caches when needed (pythonGH-98181) ...
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull requestOct 14, 2022
* main: (37 commits)pythongh-98251: Allow venv to pass along PYTHON* variables to pip and ensurepip when they do not impact path resolution (pythonGH-98259) Bpo-41246: IOCP Proactor avoid callback code duplication (python#21399) bpo-46364: Use sockets for stdin of asyncio only on AIX (python#30596)pythongh-98178: syslog() is not thread-safe on macOS (python#98213) Mark all targets in `Doc/Makefile` as `PHONY` (pythonGH-98189)pythongh-97982: Factorize PyUnicode_Count() and unicode_count() code (python#98025)pythongh-96265: Formatting changes for faq/general (python#98129) tutorial: remove "with single quotes" (python#98204)pythongh-97669: Remove Tools/scripts/startuptime.py (python#98214) signalmodule.c uses _PyErr_WriteUnraisableMsg() (python#98217)pythongh-97669: Fix test_tools reference leak (python#98216)pythongh-97669: Create Tools/patchcheck/ directory (python#98186)pythongh-65046: Link to logging cookbook from asyncio docs (python#98207) Formatting fixes in contextlib docs (python#98111)pythongh-95276: Add callable entry to the glossary (python#95738)pythongh-96130: Rephrase use of "typecheck" verb for clarity (python#98144) Fix some incorrect indentation around the main switch (python#98177)pythongh-98172: Fix formatting in `except*` docs (python#98173)pythongh-97982: Remove asciilib_count() (python#98164)pythongh-95756: Free and NULL-out code caches when needed (pythonGH-98181) ...
pablogsal pushed a commit that referenced this pull requestOct 22, 2022
I'm sympathetic to the issue report, especially in case this helpsclarify to new users that Python itself does not do type checking at runtime(cherry picked from commited6344e)Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
I'm sympathetic to the issue report that "typecheck" could be read as a verb meaning "to do type checking". Especially in case this helps clarify to new users that Python itself does not do type checking at runtime