Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork32.1k
GH-97002: Prevent_PyInterpreterFrames from backing more than onePyFrameObject#97996
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Thanks@brandtbucher for the PR, and@markshannon for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
bedevere-bot commentedOct 6, 2022
GH-98002 is a backport of this pull request to the3.11 branch. |
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull requestOct 6, 2022
… one `PyFrameObject` (pythonGH-97996)(cherry picked from commit21a2d9f)Co-authored-by: Brandt Bucher <brandtbucher@microsoft.com>
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull requestOct 8, 2022
* main:pythonGH-97002: Prevent `_PyInterpreterFrame`s from backing more than one `PyFrameObject` (pythonGH-97996)pythongh-97973: Return all necessary information from the tokenizer (pythonGH-97984)fixespythongh-96078: os.sched_yield release the GIL while calling sched_yield(2). (pythongh-97965)pythongh-65961: Do not rely solely on `__cached__` (pythonGH-97990)pythongh-97850: Remove the open issues section from the import reference (python#97935) Docs: pin sphinx-lint (pythonGH-97992)pythongh-94590: add signatures to operator itemgetter, attrgetter, methodcaller (python#94591) Add Pynche's move to the What's new in 3.11 (python#97974)pythongh-97781: Apply changes from importlib_metadata 5. (pythonGH-97785)pythongh-86482: Document assignment expression need for ()s (python#23291)pythongh-97943: PyFunction_GetAnnotations should return a borrowed reference. (python#97949)
mpage pushed a commit to mpage/cpython that referenced this pull requestOct 11, 2022
… one `PyFrameObject` (pythonGH-97996)
| // Just pretend that we have an owned, cleared frame so frame_dealloc | ||
| // doesn't make the situation worse: | ||
| f->f_frame = (_PyInterpreterFrame *)f->_f_frame_data; | ||
| f->f_frame->owner = FRAME_CLEARED; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
FRAME_CLEARED is a value ofenum _framestate. Shouldn’t->owner be a value ofenum _frameowner instead?
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Labels
interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs) sprinttype-crashA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dump
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There is a nasty situation where a GC collection during
PyFrameObjectallocation could create multiplePyFrameObjects for the same_PyInterpreterFrame, which breaks our ownership rules and creates all sorts of opportunities for accessing corrupted memory.If this happens, we just keep the
PyFrameObjectthat has already been exposed to user code, and throw away the duplicate.PyFrameObjects can be created for a single_PyInterpreterFrame#97002