this opts asyncio.Runner out of the policy system and asyncio.run opts back in

If this is classified as a bug (clearly it is causing issues), then fixing it shouldn't be blocking. By only implementing this behind an argument we are introducing a new feature which means that this will only be added to 3.12 (and not 3.11).

I would vote for not adding this argument.

I think it's important to maintain the asyncio.Runner support for a high level policy-free use of asyncio, so that the policy system can be deprecated and removed

By adding this option we make itmore difficult to deprecate the policy system because then this option will need to be deprecated as well. Users who specify this option will have more to do to migrate.

How about I remove the flag from asyncio.Runner and have callers use a wrapper that mutates the policy loop?

@contextmanagerdef_with_policy_loop(loop):try:asyncio.set_event_loop(loop)yieldfinally:asyncio.set_event_loop(None)

runner=asyncio.Runner()cmgr=_with_policy_loop(runner.get_loop())try:cmgr(runner.run)(corofn())finally:cmgr(runner.close)()

Users who specify this option will have more to do to migrate.

I'm proposing thisset_policy_loop flag get deprecated at the same time as the policy system. I could add the flag as deprecated in this PR so users won't add it unless they already have more work to do to migrate from the policy system as a concept

I don't think I understand the downside with enabling this by default. My arguments boil down to:

• With this flag disabled, we retain the current behaviour which causes issues. I would guess that most people don't fully understand what it does and will leave it to the default, then potentially run into these issues.

• As we've so far discussed, this flag is a fix for an issue which might soon no matter much because it is planned to be deprecated. With this option needing to be explicitly enabled, we introduce more things to deprecate. If, instead, this would be enabled by default then most would not need to change anything as it gets removed after the deprecation period.

I am not super confident in the event loop policy system, so I won't continue arguing if you don't agree with me after this comment - i'll defer to whenever a core dev takes a look at this issue.

With this flag disabled, we retain the current behaviour which causes issues. I would guess that most people don't fully understand what it does and will leave it to the default, then potentially run into these issues.

It should be opt in for asyncio.Runner

yep: set_policy_loop defaults to False inasyncio.Runner:def __init__(self, *, debug=None, loop_factory=None, set_policy_loop=False):

people using the oldasyncio.run get the old behaviour that uses the policy loop factory and sets the policy loop. People using the newasyncio.Runner get the new behaviour which does not use the policy loop factory or set the policy loop by default

This long sentence is quite wordy and without knowing the change I would probably not understand what it means.

I would probably suggest not making this change (referring to this very sentence). To most, setting the loop in the event loop policy is probably synonymous to actually creating and running a loop.

@kumaraditya303 it looks like your PR is missing some calls to set_event_loop here

asyncio.Runner should be used a context manager and its close method removes the set event loop so not required here.

the issue being when Runner.run finishes the loop should be unset

withRunner()asrunner1,Runner()asrunner2:runner1.run(fn())# calls set_event_looprunner2.run(fn())# also calls set_event_loop# I'd expect the event loop to be unset here

I'd expect the event loop to be unset here

That happens only if you supply yourloop_factory otherwise for existing code, its better to keep it set for existing code not usingasyncio.Runner.

I would expect the event loop to be set until the context manager exit which is what we have currently.

Ah I see what you mean