Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Improve the more elaborate multiprocessing example in the logging cookbook#9326

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
vsajip merged 1 commit intopython:masterfromgeryogam:patch-1
Sep 25, 2018

Conversation

geryogam
Copy link
Contributor

@geryogamgeryogam commentedSep 14, 2018
edited
Loading

This pull request will:

  • remove the unuseddetailed formatter in theconfig_initial dictionary;
  • modify the implementation of thehandle method of theMyHandler class to consider the loggers' levels in theconfig_listener dictionary.

@vsajip
Copy link
Member

Please revert the whitespace /PEP-8 changes, which are not applicable to the specific example we discussed. Just keep the changes within the specific example script.

@vsajipvsajip changed the titleImprove the more elaborate multiprocessing exampleImprove the more elaborate multiprocessing example in the logging cookbookSep 15, 2018
…kbook* Remove the unused detailed formatter in the config_initial dictionary.* Modify the implementation of the  method of the MyHandler class to consider the loggers' levels in the config_listener dictionary.
@geryogam
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@vsajip

Please revert the whitespace / PEP-8 changes, which are not applicable to the specific example we discussed. Just keep the changes within the specific example script.

Done.

@vsajip
Copy link
Member

Done.

OK, thanks. Just as a general suggestion - please avoid making stylistic changes which aren't specific to the issue being addressed. For example, you have re-ordered some dictionary keys, added blank lines and removed trailing commas, where none of these changes were needed in order to (a) remove the unused formatter and (b) respect the logger level while dispatching events. While I'm not asking you to revert these, it's generally best to minimise noise in PRs - because it makes life easier for reviewers not to have to review stylistic changes which have no impact on the functionality changes being addressed.

@vsajipvsajip merged commit5b3cbcd intopython:masterSep 25, 2018
@geryogamgeryogam deleted the patch-1 branchSeptember 25, 2018 10:08
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docsDocumentation in the Doc dirskip issueskip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@geryogam@vsajip@the-knights-who-say-ni@bedevere-bot

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp