Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

 Sign up
Appearance settings

bpo-32475: Add argument to peek() into I/O buffer without reading#7947

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
hashbrowncipher wants to merge2 commits intopython:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromhashbrowncipher:bpo-32475

Conversation

hashbrowncipher
Copy link
Contributor

@hashbrowncipherhashbrowncipher commentedJun 27, 2018•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Previously it was impossible to ensure that a program had read all of the data
out of its buffer before it calleddetach(). With this change, calling
reader.peek(0, False) will enable the program to gracefully transition from
buffered I/O to raw I/O.

https://bugs.python.org/issue32475

Previously it was impossible to ensure that a program had read all of the dataout of its buffer before it called `detach()`. With this change, calling`reader.peek(0, False)` will enable the program to gracefully transition frombuffered I/O to raw I/O.
@the-knights-who-say-ni

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed thePSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please followthe steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

When your account is ready, please add a comment in this pull request
and a Python core developer will remove theCLA not signed label
to make the bot check again.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@hashbrowncipher
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I've now signed the CLA:https://bugs.python.org/user28818

@github-actionsGitHub Actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot added the staleStale PR or inactive for long period of time. labelSep 21, 2024
@python-cla-bot
Copy link

The following commit authors need to sign the Contributor License Agreement:

CLA signed

@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the staleStale PR or inactive for long period of time. labelApr 9, 2025
@github-actionsGitHub Actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot added the staleStale PR or inactive for long period of time. labelMay 10, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
awaiting reviewstaleStale PR or inactive for long period of time.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@hashbrowncipher@the-knights-who-say-ni@ezio-melotti@bedevere-bot
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp