Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork32.1k
Use current name for macOS#55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
the-knights-who-say-ni commentedFeb 12, 2017
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed thePSF contributor agreement (CLA). Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username onbugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow these steps to help rectify the issue:
Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it! |
@paulschreiber: please sign the CLA. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #55 +/- ##==========================================- Coverage 82.37% 82.37% -0.01%========================================== Files 1427 1427 Lines 350948 350948 ==========================================- Hits 289097 289095 -2- Misses 61851 61853 +2 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
I'm paulschreiber on bugs.python.org. I signed the CLA. |
@paulschreiber If you haven't put your GitHub user name in your bugs.python.org account, you will need to do that. If you have, then you should be good 👍 |
It also takes one US business day for the CLA to get updated by a human being, so hopefully this will get cleared up sometime today or tomorrow (and I checked that the GitHub username is filled in properly on bpo). |
@paulschreiber would you resolve conflict? |
thanks |
I think this needs to be backported to 3.6, 3.5, and 2.7. |
Go ahead, I think it's OK to cherry-pick to those releases, certainly for 3.6. |
(cherry picked from commitc086685)
Thanks@paulschreiber for the PR, and@methane for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 2.7. |
Sorry,@paulschreiber and@methane, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Fix a setup.cfg metadata bugClosespython#55See merge request python-devs/importlib_resources!59
This patch adds a job that is able to accurately signal whetherall the expectations of the required jobs to succeed are met.This job can then be used as a source of truth for judging whether"CI passes" and can be used in the branch protection. It also playsa role of a convenient "gate" — this is the only job that would haveto be listed in the branch protection as opposed to listing everysingle job name generated by the test matrix (and they all havedifferent names — it's not possible to just select one `test` jobname).Ref:https://github.com/re-actors/alls-green#why
…-actionsCleanup grammar and actions // Remove unnecessary fstring code
No description provided.