Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

 Sign up
Appearance settings

bpo-43884: Fix asyncio subprocess kill process cleanly when process is blocked#31611

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 commentedFeb 28, 2022•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 changed the titlebpo-issue43884: Fix asyncio subprocess kill process cleanly when process is blockedbpo-43884: Fix asyncio subprocess kill process cleanly when process is blockedFeb 28, 2022
@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 deleted the subprocess branchFebruary 28, 2022 10:20
@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 restored the subprocess branchFebruary 28, 2022 10:21
@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 changed the titlebpo-43884: Fix asyncio subprocess kill process cleanly when process is blockedbpo-46877: export unittest.doModuleCleanups in unittest packageFeb 28, 2022
@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 changed the titlebpo-46877: export unittest.doModuleCleanups in unittest packagebpo-43884: Fix asyncio subprocess kill process cleanly when process is blockedFeb 28, 2022
@mxschmitt
Copy link

@kumaraditya303 whats the reason that this got closed? Seems still affecting Python from my understanding.

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

whats the reason that this got closed? Seems still affecting Python from my understanding.

@mxschmitt
This fix didn't worked well and some tests were failing, I am working on a fix but there is no timeline currently.

mxschmitt reacted with thumbs up emoji

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

kumaraditya303 commentedOct 5, 2022•
edited
Loading

@mxschmitt FYI#32073 fixed this and is backported to 3.11.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@1st11st1Awaiting requested review from 1st11st1 is a code owner

@asvetlovasvetlovAwaiting requested review from asvetlovasvetlov is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@kumaraditya303@mxschmitt@the-knights-who-say-ni@bedevere-bot
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp