Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

bpo-46679: Don't ignore timeout argument in test.support.wait_process.#31205

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

notarealdeveloper
Copy link
Contributor

@notarealdevelopernotarealdeveloper commentedFeb 7, 2022
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

The functionwait_process inLib/test/support/__init__.py ignores itstimeout argument. This argument is useful, for example, in tests that need to determine whether a deadlock has been fixed (e.g., the test added in#30310).

https://bugs.python.org/issue46679

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
The function ``wait_process`` in ``Lib/test/support/__init__.py`` no longer
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

NEWS are not required for test-only changes. We need them for user-facing changes only 🙂

AlexWaygood reacted with thumbs up emoji
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Good to know! Thanks! :)

@notarealdeveloper
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@kumaraditya303 Done. :)

@MaxwellDupre
Copy link
Contributor

The wait_process function has changed significantly since your changes in the latest 3.12 could you please check?

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 requested review fromvstinner and removed request forvstinnerOctober 1, 2022 17:24
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

I fixed this issue with commit0ba8027. But IMO it's still interesting to fix this typo in Python 3.10 and 3.11. Can you please create a PR for the 3.11 branch?

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as it is fixed on main. If you are interested, feel free to create 3.11 backport as Victor suggested.

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

This issue got fixed in 3.11 by commita9a8c87 and backported to 3.10 as commitae5317d: see issuegh-90867.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sobolevnsobolevnsobolevn left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
awaiting reviewskip newstestsTests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants
@notarealdeveloper@MaxwellDupre@vstinner@kumaraditya303@sobolevn@the-knights-who-say-ni@ezio-melotti@bedevere-bot@AlexWaygood

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp