Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[3.9] bpo-45772: socket.socket should be a class instead of a function (GH-23960)#29543

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islingtonmiss-islington commentedNov 13, 2021
edited
Loading

  • bpo-45772: socket.socket should be a class instead of a function

Currentlysocket.socket is documented as a function, but it is really
a class (and thus has function-like usage to construct an object). This
correction would ensure that Python projects that are interlinking
Python's documentation can properly locatesocket.socket as a type.
(cherry picked from commit4c792f3)

Co-authored-by: Hong Xuhong@topbug.net

https://bugs.python.org/issue45772

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:asvetlov

…honGH-23960)* bpo-45772: socket.socket should be a class instead of a functionCurrently `socket.socket` is documented as a function, but it is reallya class (and thus has function-like usage to construct an object). Thiscorrection would ensure that Python projects that are interlinkingPython's documentation can properly locate `socket.socket` as a type.(cherry picked from commit4c792f3)Co-authored-by: Hong Xu <hong@topbug.net>
@bedevere-botbedevere-bot added the docsDocumentation in the Doc dir labelNov 13, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@xuhdev and@asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@xuhdev and@asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@miss-islington: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islingtonmiss-islington merged commitb952f60 intopython:3.9Nov 13, 2021
@miss-islingtonmiss-islington deleted the backport-4c792f3-3.9 branchNovember 13, 2021 06:29
@miss-islington
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@xuhdev and@asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@asvetlovasvetlovasvetlov approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docsDocumentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
@miss-islington@asvetlov@the-knights-who-say-ni@bedevere-bot@xuhdev

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp