Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[3.10] bpo-39452: Rewrite and expand __main__.rst (GH-26883)#27932

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islingtonmiss-islington commentedAug 24, 2021
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Broadened scope of the document to explicitly discuss and differentiate between__main__.py in packages versus the__name__ == '__main__' expression (and the idioms that surround it), as well asimport __main__.

Co-authored-by: Géry Ogamgery.ogam@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Éric Araujomerwok@netwok.org
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langalukasz@langa.pl
(cherry picked from commit7cba231)

Co-authored-by: Jack DeVries58614260+jdevries3133@users.noreply.github.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue39452

Broadened scope of the document to explicitly discuss and differentiate between ``__main__.py`` in packages versus the ``__name__ == '__main__'`` expression (and the idioms that surround it), as well as ``import __main__``.Co-authored-by: Géry Ogam <gery.ogam@gmail.com>Co-authored-by: Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org>Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>(cherry picked from commit7cba231)Co-authored-by: Jack DeVries <58614260+jdevries3133@users.noreply.github.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@jdevries3133 and@ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@jdevries3133 and@ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Copy link
Contributor

@ambvambv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Doc-only change.

@miss-islingtonmiss-islington merged commitec5a031 intopython:3.10Aug 24, 2021
@miss-islingtonmiss-islington deleted the backport-7cba231-3.10 branchAugust 24, 2021 20:54
@miss-islington
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@jdevries3133 and@ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ambvambvambv approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docsDocumentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
@miss-islington@ambv@the-knights-who-say-ni@bedevere-bot@jdevries3133

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp