Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork34.1k
bpo-28556: Update the opening note in typing docs#16204
Merged
ilevkivskyi merged 2 commits intopython:masterfromSep 16, 2019
Merged
bpo-28556: Update the opening note in typing docs#16204ilevkivskyi merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom
ilevkivskyi merged 2 commits intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
Doc/library/typing.rst Outdated
| :term:`provisional basis <provisional api>`. New features might | ||
| be added and API may change even between minor releases if deemed | ||
| necessary by the core developers. | ||
| Python runtime does not enforce the function and variable type annotations. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
The Python runtime does not enforcethe function and ...
gvanrossum approved these changesSep 16, 2019
Member
gvanrossum left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I don't recall exactly how it became non-provisional, I think we already bent the rules for provisional modules by keeping it provisional longer than one release cycle. :-)
Contributor
miss-islington commentedSep 16, 2019
Thanks@ilevkivskyi for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7, 3.8. |
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull requestSep 16, 2019
This PR replaces the old note mentioning that `typing` is a provisional module with a new one mentioning types are not enforced at runtime. I am not sure if there was any official announcement about making `typing` non-provisional, but _de-facto_ no new features were added during Python 3.7, and no backwards incompatible changes were made except for few small things that were considered bugs.(cherry picked from commit81528ba)Co-authored-by: Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi@gmail.com>
bedevere-bot commentedSep 16, 2019
GH-16205 is a backport of this pull request to the3.8 branch. |
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull requestSep 16, 2019
This PR replaces the old note mentioning that `typing` is a provisional module with a new one mentioning types are not enforced at runtime. I am not sure if there was any official announcement about making `typing` non-provisional, but _de-facto_ no new features were added during Python 3.7, and no backwards incompatible changes were made except for few small things that were considered bugs.(cherry picked from commit81528ba)Co-authored-by: Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi@gmail.com>
bedevere-bot commentedSep 16, 2019
GH-16206 is a backport of this pull request to the3.7 branch. |
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull requestSep 16, 2019
This PR replaces the old note mentioning that `typing` is a provisional module with a new one mentioning types are not enforced at runtime. I am not sure if there was any official announcement about making `typing` non-provisional, but _de-facto_ no new features were added during Python 3.7, and no backwards incompatible changes were made except for few small things that were considered bugs.(cherry picked from commit81528ba)Co-authored-by: Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull requestSep 16, 2019
This PR replaces the old note mentioning that `typing` is a provisional module with a new one mentioning types are not enforced at runtime. I am not sure if there was any official announcement about making `typing` non-provisional, but _de-facto_ no new features were added during Python 3.7, and no backwards incompatible changes were made except for few small things that were considered bugs.(cherry picked from commit81528ba)Co-authored-by: Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi@gmail.com>
JelleZijlstra added a commit to python/peps that referenced this pull requestMay 1, 2021
PEP 484 is still marked as "Provisional", but as@Fidget-Spinner pointed out inpython/typing#805, it shouldn't be any more.python/cpython#16204 removed talk about typing's provisional status from the module docs, and enhancements to typing have been in the form of new PEPs for the last few release cycles.Going to mark this as a draft so Guido can have a chance to comment once he's back.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
This PR replaces the old note mentioning that
typingis a provisional module with a new one mentioning types are not enforced at runtime. I am not sure if there was any official announcement about makingtypingnon-provisional, butde-facto no new features were added during Python 3.7, and no backwards incompatible changes were made except for few small things that were considered bugs.https://bugs.python.org/issue28556