Can you check if there are other typos in the docstrings of this module as well as checking the online RST docs to see if therendered content has such typos?

Actually, by looking at the file, I see that it's not the only place that the references are wrongly... produced. So... sorry but I think the change would still too big (we sometimes have "L. Masinter", sometimes "L.Masinter" and sometimes "L Masinter"). So... I would either:

• Properly format the references in a canonical format (MLA, APA, ePrint, whichsoever is the best here).
• Do nothing.

I'm now more inclined to actually do nothing even if the docstring is user-facing.

cc@hugovk

I don't mind, but the relevant RFCs all say L. Masinter at the top.

Ok, since it's about a list of references, let's properly list them. If it were some other stuff in the prose, maybe it would have been fine, but let's properly format the list of references (not just L. Masinter).