!buildbot emscripten

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by@hoodmane for commit0ffb76b 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F137470%2Fmerge

The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression:emscripten

The builders matched are:

• WASM Emscripten PR

!buildbot emscripten

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by@hoodmane for commit04e0541 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F137470%2Fmerge

The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression:emscripten

The builders matched are:

• WASM Emscripten PR

There's three blockers to this at present:

1. Thecheck-c-globals analyser check that is failing CI on this PR
2. The test suite CI failure that is also visible on main, because of the change fromgh-131876: extract_hashlib helpers into a separate directory #136995.gh-131876: extract_hashlib helpers into a separate directory #137319 looks like a possible fix; however, it looks like it's on hold pending some other changes.
3. The refactoring of the build script that we discussed at EuroPython (andon the buildmaster-config PR) to encode the Emscripten version as part of the build script, and use an argument to point at a local cache directory.

The alternative to (3) would be to violate the "RC1 is where we lock in the Emscripten version" rule, and bump to 4.0.12. That isn't an approach we could take in the general case, but given this is the first "back to Tier 3" release, and there's no impact on downstream packagers (since nobody can publish to PyPI, so nobody will be relying on the 4.0.11 ABI guarantee), I could probably be convinced to do this - but I'd like@hugovk to sign off on the plan as release manager.

Of course (3) is going to be needed in the fullness of time - it's just a question of whether we need to do itright now. And (1) and (2) will need a fix regardless.

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phraseI have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

This PR isn't urgent so I think it would be fine to block it on making an Emscripten version manager. But it would also be fine to bump the Emscripten version for 3.14 imo.

I reverted the hashlib refactorization by the way, so failures on main shouldn't be because of this.

Thanks@picnixz. Failure on main is a runtime failure in a test about calendars and locales, not the linker error.

Hmm the C parser doesn't work with out of tree builds because it passes a bunch of invalid paths like-I/home/rchatham/cpython/*./Include cc@ericsnowcurrently
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Tools/c-analyzer/cpython/_parser.py?plain=1#L120

I can't reproduce theNotImplementedError locally:

NotImplementedError: (Struct(file=FileInfo(filename='/home/runner/work/cpython/cpython/Include/pystate.h',lno=62),name='_stack_chunk',data=[Member(name='previous',vartype=VarType(typequal=None,typespec='struct _stack_chunk',abstract='*'),size=None),Member(name='size',vartype=VarType(typequal=None,typespec='size_t',abstract=''),size=None),Member(name='top',vartype=VarType(typequal=None,typespec='size_t',abstract=''),size=None),Member(name='data',vartype=VarType(typequal=None,typespec='PyObject',abstract='* [1]'),size=None)],parent=None), [TypeDef(file=FileInfo(filename='/home/runner/work/cpython/cpython/Include/pytypedefs.h',lno=18),name='PyObject',data=VarType(typequal=None,typespec='struct _object',abstract=''),parent=None),TypeDef(file=FileInfo(filename='/home/runner/work/cpython/cpython/Python/emscripten_trampoline_inner.c',lno=1),name='PyObject',data=VarType(typequal=None,typespec='void',abstract=''),parent=None)])

I reverted the hashlib refactorization by the way, so failures on main shouldn't be because of this.

My apologies - I missed that the cause of the CI failures on main had changed. Thanks for the revert - now to work out what's going on with Calendars... :-)

!buildbot emscripten

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by@freakboy3742 for commita1753d6 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F137470%2Fmerge

The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression:emscripten

The builders matched are:

• WASM Emscripten PR

!buildbot emscripten

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by@hoodmane for commit0ca9e4c 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F137470%2Fmerge

The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression:emscripten

The builders matched are:

• WASM Emscripten PR

Thanks@hoodmane for the PR, and@freakboy3742 for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.14.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

GH-139039 is a backport of this pull request to the3.14 branch.