Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.3k
gh-136285: Improvepickle protocol testing intest_interpreters#136286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LGTM. 👍
It looks that there is a bug. So it is better to fix it first and then run tests for all protocols. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LGTM. 👍
This is the right way that preserves the same semantic as for protocols >= 2.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
06e347b intopython:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Thanks@sobolevn for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.14. |
…ers` (pythonGH-136286)(cherry picked from commit06e347b)Co-authored-by: sobolevn <mail@sobolevn.me>
GH-136333 is a backport of this pull request to the3.14 branch. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
test_interpretersmisses tests with allpickleprotocols #136285