Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

 Sign up
Appearance settings

bpo-36379: __ipow__ must be a ternaryfunc, not a binaryfunc#13546

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

@ZackerySpytz
Copy link
Contributor

@ZackerySpytzZackerySpytz commentedMay 24, 2019•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

If a type'sipow method was implemented in C, attempting to use
themodulo parameter would cause crashes.

https://bugs.python.org/issue36379

If a type's __ipow__ method was implemented in C, attempting to usethe *modulo* parameter would cause crashes.
Copy link
Member

@tirantiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Thanks!

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks@ZackerySpytz for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

I'm having trouble backporting to3.7. Reason: 'Error 110 while writing to socket. Connection timed out.'. Please retry by removing and re-adding theneeds backport to 3.7 label.

DinoV pushed a commit to DinoV/cpython that referenced this pull requestJan 14, 2020
…-13546)If a type's __ipow__ method was implemented in C, attempting to usethe *modulo* parameter would cause crashes.https://bugs.python.org/issue36379
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tirantirantiran approved these changes

@skrahskrahAwaiting requested review from skrah

+1 more reviewer

@auvipyauvipyauvipy approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@ZackerySpytz@miss-islington@tiran@auvipy@the-knights-who-say-ni@bedevere-bot
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp