As expected,performance is neutral.

When you're done making the requested changes, leave the comment:I have made the requested changes; please review again.

I believe the magic number needs to be updated (and everything regenerated too) since the exception_unwind label now pushes tagged ints.

Nothing has changed in terms of stack effects. The only change is that we push a tagged int instead of a boxed one.

The failure on JIT/ARM64 look like a JIT bug. The assertion errors seem impossible and do not occur on any other platform.
Neither the ARM64 (JIT) interpreter or the other JIT builds show any of the failures.

I think I've seen that JIT failure before on my old PR when I used a different tagging scheme.

The JIT ARM 64 windows failure is just a timeout for the int repr test that sometimes happens.

This isn't a JIT problem, it's a tier two problem (I can reproduce on an M2 Mac with--with-pydebug --enable-experimental-jit=interpreter). Digging in deeper...

When entering tier two, the current frame'sf_executable is0x0000000000000002. Which is, uh, not a valid stackref. It looks suspiciously likeBITS_TO_PTR_MASKED(PyStackRef_TagInt(0)).

Never mind, it looks like the bugis in the JIT code. I believe this is because the Clang is not actually inlining the some_PyFrame_GetCode calls used forstack_pointer sanity checks on this build. Instead, it’s emitting the code for the function alongside the normal bytecode, and making calls tothat. My guess is it’s using some clever calling convention or something and we’re messing up how it’s being called.

@markshannon, this fixes it:

diff --git a/Tools/jit/_stencils.py b/Tools/jit/_stencils.pyindex 8faa9e8cac2..639e4bcc793 100644--- a/Tools/jit/_stencils.py+++ b/Tools/jit/_stencils.py@@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ def process_relocations(                 hole.kind                 in {"R_AARCH64_CALL26", "R_AARCH64_JUMP26", "ARM64_RELOC_BRANCH26"}                 and hole.value is HoleValue.ZERO+                and hole.symbol not in self.symbols             ):                 hole.func = "patch_aarch64_trampoline"                 hole.need_state = True

For anyone curious: on this particular build, Clang doesn't inline one of the calls to_PyFrame_GetCode, and instead emits it alongside our_JIT_ENTRY function. This is fine, but our handling of jumps on AArch64 macOS (which inserts trampolines for out-of-range jumps) meant that we tried to "link against" the_PyFrame_GetCode function in the main executable, rather than the (slightly different!) version the compiler emitted as part of the stencil.

Though they bothshould be identical, my guess is that Clang realized that the function was static and only called in one place by the bytecode, and didn't use an ABI-conforming calling convention. If we change the logic to check for duplicate local symbols in the template before trying to link to the main executable (which is what my change does), then we end up calling the intended version of the function.

(And, in case anyone was wondering:lldb is useless in our JIT code, andprintf-debugging didn't help at all in this situation. It was basically just looking at the template we generated alongside the disassembly that led to the "aha" moment.)

@markshannon, you applied my patch to the wrong line.