Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork32k
gh-132426:get_annotate_function
vs. mapping namespaces#132427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Élie Goudout <eliegoudout@hotmail.com>
python-cla-botbot commentedApr 12, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Most changes to Pythonrequire a NEWS entry. Add one using theblurb_it web app or theblurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
get_annotate_function
should allow mapping-like objectsI convert back to draft because ofthis. |
get_annotate_function
should allow mapping-like objectsget_annotate_function
vs. mapping namespacesUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Signed-off-by: Élie Goudout <eliegoudout@hotmail.com>
Most changes to Pythonrequire a NEWS entry. Add one using theblurb_it web app or theblurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
Closing in favor of#132490 |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Closes#132426
dict
#132426