Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.3k
gh-129107: two cases where second operand needs lock#130227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
tom-pytel commentedFeb 17, 2025
Ping@kumaraditya303 |
tom-pytel commentedFeb 17, 2025
I added a lock for the second operand in |
tom-pytel commentedFeb 23, 2025
ping@colesbury |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
e85f81f intopython:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
…sections are needed (python#130227)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Identified three cases where a second operand needs to be locked. Also double checked other two operand functions:
PyByteArray_Concatbytearray_richcompareBut those "lock" both self and their counterparts purely through the buffer mechanism so there are no issues in those.