Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[3.12] CI: Fix usingcheck_source flags as bool (GH-121848)#121855

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
hugovk merged 1 commit intopython:3.12fromwebknjaz:backport-a0b205b-3.12
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

webknjaz
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, those flags would sometimes end up having empty string values, which tends to break evaluating them as JSON. This patch addsfalse fallbacks to all such outputs.

This allows feeding them tofromJSON() without a fear of them causing surprising internal behaviors in the GitHub Actions CI/CD workflows platform itself [1]. The behavior observed was that some skipped jobs wouldn't show up in the workflow sidebar view at all, would display in the graph view asWaiting for pending jobs and in the${{ needs }} context, they would have aresult: failure entry [2].

This should help make PRs like#121831 mergeable again.

(cherry picked from commita0b205b)

(cherry picked from commita0b205b)Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk@sydorenko.org.ua>
@hugovkhugovk changed the title[3.12] 🧪🚑 Fix usingcheck_source flags as bool (GH-121848).[3.12] Fix usingcheck_source flags as bool (GH-121848)Jul 16, 2024
@hugovkhugovkenabled auto-merge (squash)July 16, 2024 13:55
@hugovkhugovk changed the title[3.12] Fix usingcheck_source flags as bool (GH-121848)[3.12] CI: Fix usingcheck_source flags as bool (GH-121848)Jul 16, 2024
@hugovkhugovk merged commit61d5e87 intopython:3.12Jul 16, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ezio-melottiezio-melottiAwaiting requested review from ezio-melottiezio-melotti is a code owner

@hugovkhugovkAwaiting requested review from hugovkhugovk is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@webknjaz@hugovk

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp