Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork32.4k
gh-119317: findall instead of traverse for docutils nodes#119319
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
gh-119317: findall instead of traverse for docutils nodes#119319
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Most changes to Pythonrequire a NEWS entry. Add one using theblurb_it web app or theblurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
2312026
to3830593
CompareMost changes to Pythonrequire a NEWS entry. Add one using theblurb_it web app or theblurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
Thank you. |
Thanks @xsc27 for the PR, and@hugovk for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12, 3.13. |
…onGH-119319)(cherry picked from commit0867bce)Co-authored-by: Carlos Meza <hire@carlosmeza.com>
GH-119486 is a backport of this pull request to the3.13 branch. |
…onGH-119319)(cherry picked from commit0867bce)Co-authored-by: Carlos Meza <hire@carlosmeza.com>
GH-119487 is a backport of this pull request to the3.12 branch. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
The new method,
findall
, is a generator rather than returning a list.closes#119317