As I stated in#114729 (comment), this method is described in detail athttps://docs.python.org/3/library/importlib.html#importlib.abc.Loader.load_module. But I don't think either suppressing this link or linking tohttps://docs.python.org/3/library/importlib.html#importlib.abc.Loader.load_module would be the correct way to resolve this reference warning. This glossary entry appears pretty out of date to me;load_module is a deprecated method, that probably shouldn't be mentioned in this glossary entry at all. We should fix the warning by making the entry up-to-date

The discussion aroundload_module seems familiar (@AlexWaygood?). I added a reference to the method.

The discussion aroundload_module seems familiar (@AlexWaygood?). I added a reference to the method.

Yes, we already had this conversation in#114729 (comment). And I still think the best way to correct this reference warning is to update the glossary entry so that it no longer refers to a deprecated method at all.

If that requires an importlib expert, then we should wait for an importlib expert to take a look.

I will let@AlexWaygood and@serhiy-storchaka sort this out. Let me know your collective decision and I'll change the ref to suit so we can close out this PR.

I agree that it is better to not refer to the deprecated method. But this requires the larger change that simply adding the exclamation mark.

So this Sphinx warnings serves as a reminder to rewrite the docs.

I agree that it is better to not refer to the deprecated method. But this requires the larger change that simply adding the exclamation mark.

So this Sphinx warnings serves as a reminder to rewrite the docs.

Exactly. I would prefer that we leave this Sphinx warning unfixed for now, until we are able to fix it properly, by updating the entry so that it no longer refers to a deprecated method. I said this in#114729 (comment) and#114982 (comment)

Closing. Will let others decide how best to correct this.