Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.7k
gh-53502: Fixes for tests in gh-113363#113627
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1. Use 32-bit compatible date in test_dump_naive_datetime_with_aware_datetime_option2. test_dump_naive_datetime_with_aware_datetime_option: Writing non-aware datetimes with aware_datetime==True leads to the time being off by twice the timezone offset from UTC
ContributorAuthor
ronaldoussoren commentedJan 1, 2024
!buildbot s390x SLES 3.x |
bedevere-bot commentedJan 1, 2024
The regex 's390x SLES 3.x' did not match any buildbot builder. Is the requested builder in the list of stable builders? |
ContributorAuthor
ronaldoussoren commentedJan 1, 2024
!buildbot s390x.* |
bedevere-bot commentedJan 1, 2024
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by@ronaldoussoren for commit6d62630 🤖 The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: The builders matched are:
|
…he aware_datimetime setting
kulikjak pushed a commit to kulikjak/cpython that referenced this pull requestJan 22, 2024
*pythongh-53502: Fixes for tests inpythongh-113363* Use 32-bit compatible date in test_dump_naive_datetime_with_aware_datetime_option* Saving non-aware datetimes will use the old behaviour regardless of the aware_datimetime setting
aisk pushed a commit to aisk/cpython that referenced this pull requestFeb 11, 2024
*pythongh-53502: Fixes for tests inpythongh-113363* Use 32-bit compatible date in test_dump_naive_datetime_with_aware_datetime_option* Saving non-aware datetimes will use the old behaviour regardless of the aware_datimetime setting
Glyphack pushed a commit to Glyphack/cpython that referenced this pull requestSep 2, 2024
*pythongh-53502: Fixes for tests inpythongh-113363* Use 32-bit compatible date in test_dump_naive_datetime_with_aware_datetime_option* Saving non-aware datetimes will use the old behaviour regardless of the aware_datimetime setting
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Use 32-bit compatible date in test_dump_naive_datetime_with_aware_datetime_option
test_dump_naive_datetime_with_aware_datetime_option: Writing non-aware datetimes with aware_datetime==True leads to the time being off by twice the timezone offset from UTC