Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[3.12] gh-112826: Fix the threading Module When _thread is Missing _is_main_interpreter()#112850

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently commentedDec 7, 2023
edited by github-actionsbot
Loading

_thread._is_main_interpreter() was added (and aliased asthreading._is_main_interpreter()) after the 3.12.0 release, ingh-110707 (a backport ofgh-112661). However, that change did not accommodate cases where users replace the_thread module with a custom version that doesn't have_is_main_interpreter() defined (e.g. gevent).

This change fixes that by falling back to a dummy_is_main_interpreter() that always says "yes". That case is unlikely and the consequences of saying a subinterpreter is the main interpreter, relative to `threading._shutdown(), are almost zero.

(We are fixing this in 3.12 only because it is a regression from the already released 3.12.0. In 3.13 (main) we will only have the note in "What's New".)


📚 Documentation preview 📚:https://cpython-previews--112850.org.readthedocs.build/

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: T. Wouters <thomas@python.org>
ericsnowcurrently added a commit to ericsnowcurrently/cpython that referenced this pull requestDec 7, 2023
@Yhg1sYhg1senabled auto-merge (squash)December 7, 2023 20:08
@Yhg1sYhg1s merged commitc0fc88f intopython:3.12Dec 7, 2023
@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently deleted the backport-3.12-fix-112826-missing-_thread-_is_main_interpreter branchDecember 7, 2023 20:21
ericsnowcurrently added a commit that referenced this pull requestDec 7, 2023
gh-112853)As ofgh-112661, the threading module expects the _thread module to have a _is_main_interpreter(), which is used in the internal threading._shutdown().  This change causes a problem for anyone that replaces the _thread module with a custom one (only if they don't provide _is_main_interpreter()).  They need to be sure to add it for 3.13+, thus this PR is adding a note in "What's New".This also forward-ports the "What's New" entry from 3.12 (gh-112850).  Note that we do not also forward-port the fix in that PR.  The fix is there only due to a regression from 3.12.0. There is no regression in 3.13+.
aisk pushed a commit to aisk/cpython that referenced this pull requestFeb 11, 2024
…rpreter (pythongh-112853)As ofpythongh-112661, the threading module expects the _thread module to have a _is_main_interpreter(), which is used in the internal threading._shutdown().  This change causes a problem for anyone that replaces the _thread module with a custom one (only if they don't provide _is_main_interpreter()).  They need to be sure to add it for 3.13+, thus this PR is adding a note in "What's New".This also forward-ports the "What's New" entry from 3.12 (pythongh-112850).  Note that we do not also forward-port the fix in that PR.  The fix is there only due to a regression from 3.12.0. There is no regression in 3.13+.
Glyphack pushed a commit to Glyphack/cpython that referenced this pull requestSep 2, 2024
…rpreter (pythongh-112853)As ofpythongh-112661, the threading module expects the _thread module to have a _is_main_interpreter(), which is used in the internal threading._shutdown().  This change causes a problem for anyone that replaces the _thread module with a custom one (only if they don't provide _is_main_interpreter()).  They need to be sure to add it for 3.13+, thus this PR is adding a note in "What's New".This also forward-ports the "What's New" entry from 3.12 (pythongh-112850).  Note that we do not also forward-port the fix in that PR.  The fix is there only due to a regression from 3.12.0. There is no regression in 3.13+.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hugovkhugovkhugovk left review comments

@AlexWaygoodAlexWaygoodAlexWaygood left review comments

@Yhg1sYhg1sYhg1s approved these changes

Assignees

@Yhg1sYhg1s

Labels
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@ericsnowcurrently@hugovk@Yhg1s@AlexWaygood

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp