Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.7k
gh-112516: Update bundled pip version to 23.3.1#112517
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
ghost commentedNov 29, 2023 • edited by ghost
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited by ghost
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Most changes to Pythonrequire a NEWS entry. Add one using theblurb_it web app or theblurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
sethmlarson commentedDec 4, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Checked the In a separate directory: Those hashes match, therefore we should be fine to merge the commit:e7fe645 |
Sorry,@schribl and@ambv, I could not cleanly backport this to |
(cherry picked from commit1e4680c)Co-authored-by: Thomas Bininda <schribl@gmail.com>
GH-112718 is a backport of this pull request to the3.12 branch. |
sethmlarson commentedDec 4, 2023
I'm handling the 3.11 backport. |
GH-112719 is a backport of this pull request to the3.11 branch. |
ywluogg commentedDec 19, 2023
Hi I'm curious if this would be backported to 3.8 version? Thanks |
hugovk commentedDec 19, 2023
Python 3.8 only gets security fixes, and 3.8 releases are now provided as source only, so I don't think this qualifies for backporting on either count.
You can update pip through pip (e.g. |
ywluogg commentedDec 19, 2023
I think what we've observed is that there's a vulnability in pip 23.2, and pip 23.3 would fix it, do you think this would qualify a bump for the security fix?https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5752 |
ywluogg commentedDec 19, 2023
I'm also curious about the statement "Provided irregularly on an “as-needed” basis until October 2024." What are the regular security fixes that the community is watching an eye on for 3.8 to do the source fix? |
hugovk commentedDec 19, 2023
I don't think so, but it's up to the release managers and security team to decide. My understanding is that the CVE would only affect people trying to install a package from a Mercurial repo. Plus I'm not sure how worthwhile it is updating a pip binary file in a source-only release, when pip can be directly updated in other ways. But let's ask 3.8 release manager@ambv to confirm.
It means there are no longer planned release dates for new 3.8 versions. If a security fix comes up that is important enough to warrant a 3.8 release, one will be made at that time. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
closes:#112516
xref:pypa/pip#12370
As this also fixes some security issues within the vendored/bundled libraries this should also be backported to older releases in my opinion. I can do this manually if an automated attempt fails, but I would first wait for a recommendation on what versions this might get backported to.