Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[3.12] gh-77377: Ensure multiprocessing SemLock is valid for spawn-based Process before serializing it (GH-107275)#108377

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
Yhg1s merged 1 commit intopython:3.12frommiss-islington:backport-1700d34-3.12
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islingtonmiss-islington commentedAug 23, 2023
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Ensure multiprocessing SemLock is valid for spawn Process before serializing it.

Creating a multiprocessing SemLock with a fork context, and then trying to pass it to a spawn-created Process, would segfault if not detected early.


(cherry picked from commit1700d34)

Co-authored-by: albanDdesmaison.alban@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Pitroupitrou@free.fr

…ed Process before serializing it (pythonGH-107275)Ensure multiprocessing SemLock is valid for spawn Process before serializing it.Creating a multiprocessing SemLock with a fork context, and then trying to pass it to a spawn-created Process, would segfault if not detected early.---------(cherry picked from commit1700d34)Co-authored-by: albanD <desmaison.alban@gmail.com>Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>Co-authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr>
@Yhg1sYhg1s merged commit9cf49aa intopython:3.12Aug 23, 2023
@miss-islingtonmiss-islington deleted the backport-1700d34-3.12 branchAugust 23, 2023 23:44
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pitroupitroupitrou approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
@miss-islington@pitrou@Yhg1s@bedevere-bot@albanD

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp