Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.7k
gh-106368: Increase Argument Clinic test coverage#106728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
gh-106368: Increase Argument Clinic test coverage#106728
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
AlexWaygood commentedJul 13, 2023
I'm probably not the best reviewer for this one, but this all looks reasonable! |
erlend-aasland commentedJul 13, 2023
Thanks! I'll expand this PR so we've got better coverage for your FunctionKind PR. |
erlend-aasland commentedJul 13, 2023
With this, we're up to approx. 86% test coverage. |
miss-islington commentedJul 13, 2023
Thanks@erlend-aasland for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11, 3.12. |
miss-islington commentedJul 13, 2023
Sorry,@erlend-aasland, I could not cleanly backport this to |
)- improve output_parameter() coverage- improve coverage for Function.kind(cherry picked from commitec45c51)Co-authored-by: Erlend E. Aasland <erlend@python.org>
bedevere-bot commentedJul 13, 2023
GH-106730 is a backport of this pull request to the3.12 branch. |
bedevere-bot commentedJul 13, 2023
GH-106731 is a backport of this pull request to the3.11 branch. |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
- improve output_parameter() coverage- improve coverage for Function.kind
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.