Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork32k
gh-105481: expose opcode metadata via the _opcode module#106688
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There's a problem here with the definition of the metadata table. I'll try to sort it out tomorrow. |
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2023-07-13-16-04-15.gh-issue-105481.pYSwMj.rst OutdatedShow resolvedHide resolved
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Something worries me about the amount of repetition for each flag. But the alternative (exposing the flags as an int, and the constants) seems worse. So go for it!
Yes, I didn't want to expose the bitmap implementation. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.