Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork32.4k
gh-105927: Add PyWeakref_GetRef() function#105932
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Once this PR will be merged, I will create a follow PR to replace PyWeakref_GET_OBJECT() with PyWeakref_GetRef(). I have it locally, but GitHub doesn't let me create a "patch serie". |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
encukou commentedJun 20, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
In new API, please don't return NULL without an exception set. |
It doesn't return NULL with an exception set. |
* Add tests on PyWeakref_NewRef(), PyWeakref_GetObject(), PyWeakref_GET_OBJECT() and PyWeakref_GetRef().* PyWeakref_GetObject() now raises a TypeError if the argument is not a weak reference, instead of SystemError.
I changed the API to:
I also added tests. @erlend-aasland@encukou: Please review the updated PR. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Using an |
* Change Sphinx formatting* Don't change PyWeakref_GetObject() exception
@erlend-aasland: I addressed your review. |
Thanks! Looks good. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LGTM; I'm interested in Petr's review, though :)
Enhance also the doc: specific strong/borrowed reference
2de3897 is in itself a nice docs update that could be backported through 3.11! :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Thank you! This looks good.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
I dislike "3 states" return value: error, case 1 or case 2. It forces to store the return value in a variable and uses 2 if to cover the 3 code paths. Also, IMO the API is more error prone since someone may write the wrong test for the error case. Well, I don't know how much is just m personal taste and what is objective here 😁 I prefer to only return -1 on error, and 0 for the other cases. So I don't need an extra variable. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
📚 Documentation preview 📚:https://cpython-previews--105932.org.readthedocs.build/