Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.7k
gh-60712: Include the "object" type in the lists of documented types#103036
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
terryjreedy commentedMar 29, 2023
The original author was Martin Panter,@vadmium. I fixed the co-authorship note. |
CAM-Gerlach left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Standard reminder: You can directly apply all the suggestions you want in one go by going toFiles changed -> ClickingAdd to batch on each suggestion -> When done, clickingCommit
Thanks! Various further textual, syntactic and formatting fixes.
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2023-03-28-22-24-45.gh-issue-60712.So5uad.rst OutdatedShow resolvedHide resolved
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
'dictionaries' to 'dict'Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
terryjreedy left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I have not reviewed changes to special methods section. Will make other changes on my local copy.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
bedevere-bot commentedJun 18, 2023
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
| :term:`sequences <sequence>` (such as:class:`lists <list>` or | ||
| :class:`tuples <tuple>`) or:term:`mappings <mapping>` (like | ||
| :class:`dictionaries <dict>`), | ||
| :term:`dictionaries <dictionary>`), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
🤔 Hm… on the line before, we see a general term used (with a link to glossary) and a concrete example in parens (list and tuple links), then we have the general/glossary term mappings and should keep the specific type dict in parens to keep the intent of the text. On the other hand, if the glossary term for dictionaries is a better explanation than the dict type/function doc, and more specific than the term for mappings, the changed link could be an improvement.
Co-authored-by: Éric <merwok@netwok.org>
Co-authored-by: Éric <merwok@netwok.org>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Éric <merwok@netwok.org>
4f82621 intopython:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Thanks@furkanonder for the PR, and@willingc for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12, 3.13. |
GH-126197 is a backport of this pull request to the3.13 branch. |
GH-126198 is a backport of this pull request to the3.12 branch. |
merwok commentedFeb 5, 2025
The commit message was not trimmed, and github for some unfathomable reason defaults to concatenating the messages of all commits in the PR. I use a browser extension Refined Github to avoid this, and now there is also a repo setting to change the default merge commit message: I don’t have the time to start a discussion on the forums, but I’m leaving the idea here for someone. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Co-Authored-By:@vadmium