Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.7k
gh-101693: In sqlite3, deprecate using named placeholders with parameters supplied as a sequence#101698
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
gh-101693: In sqlite3, deprecate using named placeholders with parameters supplied as a sequence#101698
Changes from1 commit
b693895483e4d6e826428132a6ee31cc188660a742a18d0bb3f94201997ccc6cb091af450cdcc841e8a43e7b68038d1110cf3cfc81687b65File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
- Loading branch information
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -1435,6 +1435,11 @@ Cursor objects | ||||||
| and there is no open transaction, | ||||||
| a transaction is implicitly opened before executing *sql*. | ||||||
| .. versionchanged:: 3.12 | ||||||
| ||||||
| ..versionchanged::3.12 | |
| ..deprecated-removed::3.12 3.14 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Are you sure about that? The API itself is not deprecated, we're just changing it. I'm not sure what's the recommended practice here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Yeah, I know what you mean. I feel like ideally this notice would be phrased along the lines of "X behaviour/practice is now deprecated" rather than "a DeprecationWarning is now emitted". That would be more to-the-point, and it would also work more naturally with this directive (X behaviour/practice is deprecated in 3.12, and will be removed entirely in 3.14).
But I was struggling to come to with a concrete suggestion for how to reword these notices :/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
(The whatsnew and NEWS entries look great btw, it's just the notices in the API docs that feelslightly clunky to me)
erlend-aaslandFeb 14, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I feel like ideally this notice would be phrased along the lines of "X behaviour/practice is now deprecated" rather than "a DeprecationWarning is now emitted". That would be more to-the-point, and it would also work more naturally with this directive (X behaviour/practice is deprecated in 3.12, and will be removed entirely in 3.14).
Yes, but documented as deprecated and emitting aDeprecationWarning are similar, but not equal, things 🙂 With the former, we don't need to emit a warning in the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
To your original question, btw: I think it's pretty standard to use.. deprecated or.. deprecated-removed, even if it's just a particular usage of an API, rather than the API itself. See e.g.https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/asyncio-policy.html#asyncio.DefaultEventLoopPolicy, where the directive is used even though the class itself hasn't been deprecated at all; or#19867, which deprecated just a specific parameter; or lots of other examples in our docs 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Aight! I'll try to reword it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I've updated it to usedeprecated-removed, and I put in an extra line regarding what happens in 3.14. I'm too tired to reword the text 🙂
erlend-aasland marked this conversation as resolved. OutdatedShow resolvedHide resolved
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
erlend-aasland marked this conversation as resolved. OutdatedShow resolvedHide resolved
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.