@corona10 Would you be willing to review?

and makes sure that the value of that digit is copied over from the sourcelong.

Just a comment: this seems fairly harmless in this case, but I'd note that wedon't in general do anything special to make sure thatob_digit[0] contains anything meaningful in the case of zero being represented. (E.g.,_PyLong_Copy won't copy over the zero digit.) I've added a note tolongintrepr.h in this PR to clarify this.

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by@mdickinson for commit2ddd5c1 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the:hammer: test-with-buildbots label again.

@mdickinson I will take a look. Thanks

For refleak:

➜  cpython git:(pr/101038) ✗ ./python.exe -m test test_capi.test_misc -R 3:3Raised RLIMIT_NOFILE: 256 -> 10240:00:00 load avg: 1.76 Run tests sequentially0:00:00 load avg: 1.76 [1/1] test_capi.test_miscbeginning 6 repetitions123456......test_capi.test_misc leaked [200, 200, 200] references, sum=600test_capi.test_misc failed (reference leak)== Tests result: FAILURE ==1 test failed:    test_capi.test_miscTotal duration: 21.3 secTests result: FAILURE

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by@corona10 for commit877067c 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the:hammer: test-with-refleak-buildbots label again.

@mdickinson Oops, sorry, I tried to rebase the branch forrefleak test, but it messed up the commit history

@corona10 No problem; thanks for reviewing!

Thanks@mdickinson for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

GH-101219 is a backport of this pull request to the3.11 branch.