Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork33.7k
gh-95051: ensure that timeouts scheduled withasyncio.Timeout that have already expired are deliverered promptly#95109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
asyncio.Timeout are deliverered promptlyUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
asyncio.Timeout are deliverered promptlyasyncio.Timeout that have already expired are deliverered promptlyMisc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-07-21-22-59-22.gh-issue-95109.usxA9r.rst OutdatedShow resolvedHide resolved
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-07-21-22-59-22.gh-issue-95109.usxA9r.rst OutdatedShow resolvedHide resolved
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
…xA9r.rstCo-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
gvanrossum left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LG, just a nit, and maybe now that we're testing this behavior, it should be noted in the docs?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum@gmail.com>
miss-islington commentedJul 24, 2022
Thanks@graingert for the PR, and@gvanrossum for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
miss-islington commentedJul 24, 2022
Sorry@graingert and@gvanrossum, I had trouble checking out the |
gvanrossum commentedJul 24, 2022
@graingert please backport manually and ask Pablo for a review. |
miss-islington commentedJul 24, 2022
Thanks@graingert for the PR, and@gvanrossum for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
bedevere-bot commentedJul 24, 2022
GH-95216 is a backport of this pull request to the3.11 branch. |
AlexWaygood commentedJul 24, 2022 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
When@miss-islington's message is "I had trouble checking out the 3.X branch" (as opposed to "I couldn't create the backport due to a merge conflict"), just removing and re-adding the label is usually enough to fix it :) |
miss-islington commentedJul 24, 2022
Thanks@graingert for the PR, and@gvanrossum for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
… that have already expired are deliverered promptly (pythonGH-95109)Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>(cherry picked from commit0c6f898)Co-authored-by: Thomas Grainger <tagrain@gmail.com>
AlexWaygood commentedJul 24, 2022
@graingert, I already removed and re-added the label — this is the backport here |
graingert commentedJul 24, 2022
argh I saw the email notification and had a stale copy of the PR page open |
AlexWaygood commentedJul 24, 2022
It's race conditions all the way down |
gvanrossum commentedJul 24, 2022
Maybe one of you can make the bot more user friendly? |
graingert commentedJul 24, 2022
It's race conditions all the way down |
AlexWaygood commentedJul 24, 2022
It's been on my to-do list for a while..... |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.