Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork34.2k
Open
Description
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
Consider a specialized syntax error for these cases:
# Unary addition isn't allowed but we parse it for better error recovery.matchsubject:case+1:passcase1|+2|-3:passcase [1,+2,-3]:passcaseFoo(x=+1,y=-2):passcase {True:+1,False:-2}:pass
This was taken fromhttps://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/6ff4da454c448f01eb0b71728f3941870c811bfc/crates/ruff_python_parser/resources/invalid/statements/match/unary_add_usage.py. 2+ years in Ruff's parser.
Current vs proposed:
❯ ./python.exe t.py File "/Users/bartosz.slawecki/Python/cpython/t.py", line 2 case +1: ^-SyntaxError: invalid syntax+SyntaxError: cannot use unary addition in a literal pattern
The code doesn't look incorrect syntactically, which is why I think it's a good idea to add a more specific message (although it is not extremely unclear as-is assuming a pointer^ is shown).
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response