Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Incorrect optimization in JIT build #121012

Closed
Assignees
markshannon
Labels
type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
@Eclips4

Description

@Eclips4

Bug report

Bug description:

Reproducer:

deffoo():a= [1,2,3]exhit=iter(a)for_inexhit:passa.append("this should'be in exhit")print(f"got{list(exhit)}, should be []")foo()foo()foo()foo()foo()foo()

Output:

got [], should be []got [], should be []got [], should be []got [], should be []got [], should be []got ["this should'be in exhit"], should be []

Obviously, the last line is incorrect.

Output with aPYTHON_LLTRACE=2 env:

got [],shouldbe []got [],shouldbe []got [],shouldbe []got [],shouldbe []got [],shouldbe []Optimizingfoo (/home/eclips4/programming-languages/cpython/example.py:1)atbyteoffset421ADD_TO_TRACE:_START_EXECUTOR (0,target=21,operand=0x7f4646e59832)21:JUMP_BACKWARD(5)2ADD_TO_TRACE:_CHECK_VALIDITY_AND_SET_IP (0,target=21,operand=0x7f4646e59832)3ADD_TO_TRACE:_TIER2_RESUME_CHECK (0,target=21,operand=0)18:FOR_ITER_LIST(3)4ADD_TO_TRACE:_CHECK_VALIDITY_AND_SET_IP (0,target=18,operand=0x7f4646e5982c)5ADD_TO_TRACE:_ITER_CHECK_LIST (3,target=18,operand=0)6ADD_TO_TRACE:_GUARD_NOT_EXHAUSTED_LIST (3,target=18,operand=0)7ADD_TO_TRACE:_ITER_NEXT_LIST (3,target=18,operand=0)20:STORE_FAST(2)8ADD_TO_TRACE:_CHECK_VALIDITY_AND_SET_IP (0,target=20,operand=0x7f4646e59830)9ADD_TO_TRACE:_STORE_FAST (2,target=20,operand=0)21:JUMP_BACKWARD(5)10ADD_TO_TRACE:_CHECK_VALIDITY_AND_SET_IP (0,target=21,operand=0x7f4646e59832)11ADD_TO_TRACE:_JUMP_TO_TOP (0,target=0,operand=0)Createdaproto-traceforfoo (/home/eclips4/programming-languages/cpython/example.py:1)atbyteoffset36--length11Optimizedtrace (length10):0OPTIMIZED:_START_EXECUTOR (0,jump_target=7,operand=0x7f4646e59e80)1OPTIMIZED:_TIER2_RESUME_CHECK (0,jump_target=7,operand=0)2OPTIMIZED:_ITER_CHECK_LIST (3,jump_target=8,operand=0)3OPTIMIZED:_GUARD_NOT_EXHAUSTED_LIST (3,jump_target=9,operand=0)4OPTIMIZED:_ITER_NEXT_LIST (3,target=18,operand=0)5OPTIMIZED:_STORE_FAST_2 (2,target=20,operand=0)6OPTIMIZED:_JUMP_TO_TOP (0,target=0,operand=0)7OPTIMIZED:_DEOPT (0,target=21,operand=0)8OPTIMIZED:_EXIT_TRACE (0,exit_index=0,operand=0)9OPTIMIZED:_EXIT_TRACE (0,exit_index=1,operand=0)got ["this should'be in exhit"],shouldbe []

It's definitely related to this part of code:

cpython/Python/optimizer.c

Lines 1027 to 1033 ine4a97a7

if (is_for_iter_test[opcode]) {
/* Target the POP_TOP immediately after the END_FOR,
* leaving only the iterator on the stack. */
intextended_arg=inst->oparg>255;
int32_tnext_inst=target+1+INLINE_CACHE_ENTRIES_FOR_ITER+extended_arg;
jump_target=next_inst+inst->oparg+1;
}

I guess the culprit is there. If we remove the_GUARD_NOT_EXHAUSTED_LIST fromis_for_iter_test, the problem will go away (although it can still be reproduced in other ways using other (range, tuple) iterators).

CPython versions tested on:

CPython main branch

Operating systems tested on:

Linux, macOS

Linked PRs

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions


    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp